Over the past few months all I have seem the current administration do is the following:
GOVI Bank
Government owned automakers such as General Motors (GM), now newly named by bloggers in the blogosphere “Government Motors (GM)”, oh and did I mention that they chose to fire the CEO, now I’m not saying whether he did or did not do a good job point of fact is that the government should not be able to come in and remove the executive leadership from any organization, period. we also are blessed to now have a government ran financial services sector, you might recognize some of the new tank names, but due to the high percentage of ownership of these companies. It’s appropriate for rebranding, oh and did I mention I can’t wait until they decide to start firing those group of CEOs and their senior executives for their failed attempts. For those of you that are not certain this is a tongue-in-cheek. But several government firing any one or any organization is not legally justified, and if so can someone please share with me a case to review, I have lots of attorneys, Associates and acquaintances that would love an opportunity.
- Govi
- Bank of Governement
- JPGovMorgan
- etc…
Goverment Motors GM 2011 - The Libby
Every time I turn on the news these days I seem to hear about some new request, or outright appointment, of a “czar” of something or another in Obama’s new administration. why is it that the president’s cabinet has to be approved before permanent appointment. However, the president can grant sweeping authorities to as our without any type of accountability and validation against the credentials to ensure that their appropriate person for the role. I mean, we have seen some appointments to the president’s administration but had to bow out due to personal challenges such as IRS problems from Tom Daschle and Timothy Gagner, who paid his bill to get his appointment. As I opened up an issue of Men’s Fitness I found an editorial asking for another “fitness czar.” Below is a listing of current czar’s that I’m aware of and I’m certain the list will continue to grow. I would offer that you should look at the list of czars as a imperial ruler who has no accountability, responcibility other then deciding who wins and who losses.
- Bank bailout czar
- Energy czar
- Cyber czar
- Drug czar
- U.S. border czar
- Urban czar
- Performance czar
- Regulatory czar
- Stimulus accountability czar
- Iran czar
- Middle East czar
- Afghanistan czar
- Pakistan czar
This example I heard on the Fox News channel today;
an automobile dealership was being forced to close, however, after the auto czar reviewed they matter, and without any validation, other than their political leanings granted them, shall I say amnesty, which allowed them to keep their dealership doors open for business. And I bet you thought it was a lottery drawing by meticulous list of well thought out process and plans, so I guess we learned something today.
What is the true “responsibility” of a czar? To pontificate? And what is the accountability and authority? Without authority and accountability, responsibility is a myth and true performance is probably a pipe dream. Czars without authority and accountability set targets and goals, which simply leads to gaming the system by those also without accountability to the authority-less czar.
Ah yes… this will be fun. Czars and czarinas, already redundant with the responsibility of existing government organizations, spewing targets and goals galore with no one truly accountable to them, all trying to figure out how to make themselves look good. Gotta love it. Let the dysfunction begin.
I’m not certain how you feel about this, I’m concerned, the founding fathers are probably rolling over in their graves. From my vantage point, it looks as though we are moving towards a dictatorship and our next step is an oligarchy style government. Now I don’t know about you, but this is very concerning.
is larger government and dept our Great, Great grand children will never be able to pay back and that was NOT a hand he was dealt. We as U.S. Citizens need to focus on NEEDS not WANTS and get back to basics, no longer can the U.S. afford to continue spending on WANTS. IMHO
